- Alcester Office +44 (0)1789 765522
- Bedford Office +44 (0)1234 400000
- Birmingham, New St. Office +44 (0)121 270 5666
- Birmingham, Newhall St. Office +44 (0)121 703 2606
- Bristol Office +44 (0)1454 275 190
- Cardiff Office +44 (0)29 2240 8700
- Evesham Office +44 (0)1386 425300
- Gatwick Office +44 (0)1293 602890
- Harrow Office +44 (0)20 8907 4366
- Leicester Office +44 (0)116 255 9911
- Leigh Office +44 (0)1942 673311
- Lichfield Office +44 (0)1543 414426
- Luton Office +44 (0)1582 720175
- Northampton Office +44 (0)1604 233 200
- Redditch Office +44 (0)1527 406363
- Solihull Office +44 (0)121 705 2255
- Stopsley Office +44 (0)1582 453 366
- Sutton Coldfield Office +44 (0)121 355 6118
- Tunbridge Wells Office +44 (0)1892 553090
- Walkden Office +44 (0)161 790 1411
- Walsall Office +44 (0)1922 720000
- Warrington Office +44 (0)1925 632267
- Westhoughton Office +44 (0)1942 816515
- Whitefield Office +44 (0)161 796 7920
- Wigan Office +44 (0)1942 244294
Academic appeals advice
- Posted
- AuthorAndrew Barrowclough
Higher education law is a complex area where students often need expert guidance from specialist higher education law solicitors.
Recently many students have discovered whether or not they have been successful with obtaining their desired University Award or whether they have been allowed to progress to the next stage of their course (for example for medical students). After years of study it is very disheartening for a student to discover that they have missed obtaining a 2.1 qualification by 0.5% or that they have been asked to repeat their 4th year of study because they failed a subjective examination for their clinical competence.
On the one hand students face an uphill task challenging their University. It is almost impossible to challenge ‘academic judgement’ and the internal regulations are usually designed to protect the marks awarded and examination process. All students are automatically committed to these regulations as they ‘sign up’ upon enrolment and cannot later attempt to claim they are unfair.
A specific example relates to the issue of extenuating circumstances. If a student submits information about such circumstances in a timely manner and the examination board decide that they should be failed anyway, then the remedy afterwards is difficult as technically such a determination relates to academic judgement. On the other hand if a student doesn’t submit extenuating circumstances then it can be claimed that the exam board didn’t have all of the information. The problem is that then the issue arises as to why those circumstances weren’t submitted and that is often difficult to explain.
Our University lawyers are experts at guiding students through this difficult process. The best advice is to contact a specialist lawyer as early as possible before the internal university appeals processes are exhausted. We can assist to draft appeals, consider evidence and tactically plan on the next appropriate steps. We can also attend appeals hearings on your behalf to assist in objectively arguing regarding unfair treatment.
Ultimately students pay universities thousands of pounds in tuition fees and deserve to be treated fairly. Our specialist education law solicitor team can help to get the education deserved. Please do give us a call if you want further advice on 02920 291704.