- Alcester Office +44 (0)1789 765522
- Bedford Office +44 (0)1234 400000
- Birmingham, New St. Office +44 (0)121 270 5666
- Birmingham, Newhall St. Office +44 (0)121 703 2606
- Bristol Office +44 (0)1454 275 190
- Cardiff Office +44 (0)29 2240 8700
- Evesham Office +44 (0)1386 425300
- Gatwick Office +44 (0)1293 602890
- Harrow Office +44 (0)20 8907 4366
- Leicester Office +44 (0)116 255 9911
- Leigh Office +44 (0)1942 673311
- Lichfield Office +44 (0)1543 414426
- Luton Office +44 (0)1582 720175
- Northampton Office +44 (0)1604 233 200
- Redditch Office +44 (0)1527 406363
- Solihull Office +44 (0)121 705 2255
- Stopsley Office +44 (0)1582 453 366
- Sutton Coldfield Office +44 (0)121 355 6118
- Tunbridge Wells Office +44 (0)1892 553090
- Walkden Office +44 (0)161 790 1411
- Walsall Office +44 (0)1922 720000
- Warrington Office +44 (0)1925 632267
- Westhoughton Office +44 (0)1942 816515
- Whitefield Office +44 (0)161 796 7920
- Wigan Office +44 (0)1942 244294
Asking worker if she is pregnant is sex discrimination
A tribunal has ruled that asking a female colleague if she is pregnant constitutes sex discrimination. The decision followed a claim by Lesley Coia, an employee of Event Medical Groups, who alleged that her employer, director Gareth Hughes, made discriminatory comments after she mentioned she had a “surprise” for him.
The Glasgow tribunal heard that Ms. Coia, a medic in her 20s who joined the company in July 2022, was working with Mr. Hughes at an event in Dundee in July 2023 when she told him she had a “surprise.” Mr. Hughes responded by asking if she was pregnant, a question Ms. Coia found “astonishing and embarrassing.” She later expressed disbelief to colleagues about the incident.
The tribunal also heard that Mr. Hughes made further comments, suggesting he would “give her a hand” if she wasn’t already pregnant and repeated, “the offer still stands” as she walked away. A disciplinary panel assembled by the company reviewed Ms. Coia’s complaints but ultimately dismissed them.
During the tribunal, Mr. Hughes argued that his question was prompted by “health and safety concerns,” claiming he needed to know if a risk assessment was necessary. However, Employment Judge Shona MacLean ruled that a male employee wouldn’t have been asked the same question in a similar context, calling Mr. Hughes’ comments inappropriate.
Ms. Coia’s claims of discrimination were upheld, and she was awarded £6,569.42 in compensation. Judge MacLean noted that while Mr. Hughes might have attempted humor with any employee, it was unlikely he would have asked a male colleague if he was having a child or made similar remarks.